Showing posts with label Leonard Pitts Jr.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leonard Pitts Jr.. Show all posts

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Validated! Contrary to MSM's contention that they DIDN'T exist, therefore common sense voter ID laws were unnecessary, State of Florida flags THOUSANDS of potential illegal voters. Perhaps illegal voters can decide swing state's election so FL can get its 15 Minutes yet again!


newsserviceflorida video: Florida Dept. of State Elections Division spokesman Chris Cate discusses the news of thousands of Illegal voters being on county voting rolls throughout Florida, many of whom have been there for decades. May 9, 2012.
http://youtu.be/uQLlY9VNRKg


Hmm-m... so if I've got this right, the very same people whom we were assured for years by numerous political parties, ethnicity-based organizations, civil rights groups and the American Mainstream Media didn't really exist -they were just hurtful figments of our collective imagination- have not only been proven to really exist, but exist in numbers far larger than we ever thought, and have, in some cases, perhaps been voting illegally for decades?
Further, that the county in Florida with the highest concentration of those very special illegal voters is, in fact, Miami-Dade County?
Yes.


So it looks like the "experts" were wrong on everything, no?


Including Herald columnists like Leonard Pitts, Jr., who in this January 10th 2012 column, 
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/01/10/135215/commentary-voter-id-laws-and-life.html
in order to make his absurd leap in logic, has to imagine the problem of someone with no car and no bank account and no... anything.
Yes, they're as helpless as a baby!


Honestly, does Pitts really STILL think that in the year 2012, state and county governments in this country haven't already issued millions of photo ID cards to people on govt. assistance in order to cut down on fraud against taxpayers and facilitate access to cash instead of having to wait for monthly checks sent by mail?
That's been going on for well over 20 years...
Yes, Leonard Pitts, Jr. really is that out of touch!


In his mind, it's still 1966, so he has to pretend that he doesn't know anything about these common knowledge facts regarding the advent of technology, otherwise his ridiculous ideological argument falls flatter than usual.
Kansas flat!


The usual techniques employed in a Pitts column are willful and intentional ignorance about commonly known facts and imagining the worst possible scenario and then setting that bogus reality up as both normal and everywhere. 
And that person needs the help of a caring, sharing federal government that will look after them.


That's why Pitts is the Herald's resident go-to pro-Big Government columnist, and is consistent in this mantra every month of the year from his home outside of Florida.


(The columns he writes for the Herald that intentional don't have geographical datelines unless he's out of the country, so that way, you don't think about the fact that he doesn't really live in Florida, and the newspaper can continue the illusion that he has something worth reading, a foolish facade most people are hip to.)


So, speaking of phonies, when are we going to hear the logical explanation from the folks at La Raza about where all these thousands of people magically came from, after all, and how THEY could have been so wrong? 
I wan to make sure that I don't miss THAT televised press conference!


Special Note to Mainstream Media: Please don't embarrass yourselves in the future AGAIN by using those same self-interested and condescending groups, with their smug and accusatory spokes-models as "experts" on voting rights, ethnic voting turnout and civil rights, who accused anyone and everyone opposed to any reasonable common sense use of photo IDs as racists.




Ironically, you often need to show a photo ID to get into many office buildings where newspapers or TV stations have offices or bureaus, but the same newspaper's Editorial Boards were often AGAINST voter ID laws that required you to use a photo ID to prove who you were to vote.
But you do need to show one in order to get inside the building and place a newspaper classified ad!

Oh, that's right, nobody does that anymore.


And as it happens, I also don't much want to hear excuses from govt. employees working in County Election Offices who basically gave those groups cover, either, who now say, contrary to before, that nobody expects the rolls to be entirely accurate.
Uh, actually, we do.
Those people are finito, and persona non grata. 



One more reminder: Voters facing expulsion from voter rolls can ask for a hearing to dispute the finding. 
But those requests are, themselves, public records, so those of you interested in knowing whether there are any "illegal" voters in your city can ask for the list thru a public records request of your county election board if you were so inclined.
After all, how do you think the news media knew whom to contact and use as examples in this article in order to make it more sympathetic -really, using a sickly old woman?- instead of a sign of something insidious, or just further proof of more general govt. incompetency in Florida?


-----
Miami Herald

VOTING
Florida finds nearly 2,700 non-U.S. citizens on voting rolls  
The state has found thousands of potential non-U.S. citizens on voting rolls and an analysis indicates a third could have voted in previous elections. But some of the voters say they’re lawful citizens who legally cast ballots
By Marc Caputo and Steve Bousquet
May 9, 2012


Nearly 2,700 potential non-U.S. citizens are registered to vote in Florida and some could have been unlawfully casting ballots for years, according to a Miami Herald-CBS4 analysis of elections data.


The bulk of the potential non-citizen voters are in Florida’s largest county, Miami-Dade, where the elections supervisor is combing through a list of nearly 2,000 names and contacting them.


An analysis of a partial list of 350 names in Miami-Dade showed that about 104 have cast ballots going as far back as 1996.


Even if voters are on the list, it doesn’t mean they’re not eligible to cast a ballot.


Consider the case of Miami’s Maria Ginorio, a 64-year-old from Cuba, who said she became a U.S. citizen in August 2009. She said she was angered by a letter she received asking her to go to the elections office to document her status. Ginorio, who said she typically votes by absentee ballot, is ill and homebound.


"I’m not going to do anything about this,’’ Ginorio said. "I can’t. I guess I won’t vote anymore. I say this with pain in my heart, because voting is my right as a citizen.’’


Citizens like Ginorio were flagged as potentially ineligible after the state’s Division of Elections compared its database with a database maintained by Florida’s Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, which records whether a newly licensed driver is a U.S. citizen.


As a result, some citizens could appear to be non citizens now because the DHSMV computer system doesn’t automatically update when someone becomes a citizen, said Chris Cate, a spokesman with the Florida Division of Elections.


“We’re not just looking at the matches from Highway Safety,” Cate said. “We’re doing a secondary assessment here before we send the names to supervisors of elections. You have to consider that a person’s last contact with highway safety can be more than four years ago. Someone could have become a citizen in that time. So you can’t presume someone’s not an eligible voter.”


Cate said it’s not surprising that the bulk of potential non-citizen voters are in Miami-Dade. With 1.2 million active registered voters, it’s Florida’s most-populous county and it has the largest immigrant population in the state. Broward County has about 260 potential non-citizen voters on the rolls.


Christina White, a deputy Miami-Dade elections supervisor, said the county is sending out letters to all potential non voters within 30 days and is asking them to prove citizenship.


The state’s effort to clean the voter rolls are unfolding in a presidential election year in which perceptions of voting problems and potential fraud break down along partisan lines — especially after the Republican-led Legislature last year cracked down on voting registration groups and early voting on the Sunday before Election Day.


Rep. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, sponsored the election law and said he feels “validated” by the state’s actions in keeping its voter rolls clean.


“We need to protect the integrity of the system and ensure that people who aren’t eligible to vote aren’t casting ballots,” Baxley said. “The elections supervisors are going to send any names they find suspicious to the state attorneys, but the prosecutors have bigger fish to fry than this. So the only way to deal with this problem is preventative.”


But University of Florida political science professor Dan Smith, a critics of Baxley’s law, said the state purges could block eligible voters from casting ballots, thereby making the cure worse than the problem.


Smith noted that 3,000 potential non-citizen voters is a small number compared to the state’s 12 million total voters.


“This attests to the fact that there’s very little voter-registration fraud,” Smith said. “This purging can be a real problem.”


To be eligible to cast a ballot in Florida, a voter must be a state resident and a U.S. citizen with no felony record. Those who have been convicted of felonies can cast ballots if their rights have been restored by the state. It’s a third-degree felony to commit voter fraud in Florida.


Neither the state nor the county’s election office would release all of the suspected names, in part because the list contains personal data such as Social Security and driver-license numbers that are not public record.


Of the partial Miami-Dade list given to the Miami Herald, Tampa Bay Times and CBS 4, less than a third of the potential non citizens had voted, going as far back as 1996. About 39 of them are Democrats, 39 Republicans and 26 are independents or third-party voters.


About 13 of the voters cast ballots in the disputed 2000 presidential election, which was decided by 537 votes.


The state began unearthing potential non-citizen voters when the highway safety agency began coordinating with the elections division.


The post-9/11 federal REAL ID Law, which took effect in Florida in 2010, requires proof of U.S. Citizenship to obtain or renew a driver’s license. At first, the state unearthed 1,251 voters. The number now stands at 2,676. The list is expected to grow.


"Someone’s ability to vote is sacrosanct," said Julie Jones, executive director of the highway safety agency. "We’re all working together to make sure the process is valid, but our information is only as good as the last time somebody visited our office."


Jones said that because a driver’s license in Florida is valid for eight years, a non-citizen could have gotten a license prior to 2010 and subsequently become a citizen, but her agency would have no way of knowing.


Others are in Florida on work visas or student visas, Jones said. They can get temporary driver’s licenses in Florida but they can’t vote.


"I don’t think we’ll ever have a completely error-proof database," said Pinellas Supervisor of Elections Deborah Clark. "There are just so many variables."


Pinellas got a list of 36 names a couple of weeks ago. So far, Clark said, two people have provided proof of citizenship, two more say they will provide proof and one person was removed from the rolls for confirming their status as a non-citizen. Thirty one others have not yet been reached.


Anyone whose citizenship is questioned has at least 30 days to provide proof under state law.


"We don’t just take them off the rolls," Clark said. "We send them a certified letter and ask for proof of citizenship."


Pasco County received 13 names. Supervisor of Elections Brian Corley said the first two names he checked were able to prove their citizenship. They live in Ohio and Massachusetts, but vote in Florida..


"I’m just concerned about the end result," Corley said. "I don’t want to be kicking people off the rolls who are citizens."


The whole process spooks voters like Aventura’s Maria Bustamente, 63. She sounded alarmed at having her name appear in a list of potential non-citizens — but noted that while she has an ID card, she does not have a driver’s license.


“Yes,” she said with surprise, “I’m an American citizen.”


Miami Herald reporters Patricia Mazzei and Andres Viglucci contributed to this report.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Media-generated lists of merit, awards, magazine covers and always seeing what you want to see -classic absurd Leonard Pitts Jr.


Today I have the latest case of some Classic
Leonard Pitts, Jr. behavior, wherein not
actually knowing the facts in a situation isn't
a barrier to his having an opinion.
Surprise!

As predictable as the sun-rise in the East,
Leonard Pitts, Jr.
of the Miami Herald sees
race, rather than simple laziness, cronyism,
cliquishness, brown-nosing or any other other
motivation to explain away results about a media-
generated list he doesn't particularly care for.

Not that he could be bothered to actually look at
the list:
"The fact that the list is (from what I've heard,
I still haven't opened the links) lily white only
reiterates...


See the rest of the post at Richard Prince's blog,
Journal-isms at the Maynard Institute.
The institute is named for the former Oakland
Tribune
editor Robert C. Maynard, who became
quite well-known for his frequent TV appearances
on ABC News' This Week With David Brinkley and
PBS
' MacNeil Lehrer Report, under a post titled
Black Pulitzer Winners See Media Lists as
"Cliquish"

http://mije.org/richardprince/scared-shaken-chilean-earthquake#Black%20Pulitzers

As an aside, please try to think of an African-American
reporter, columnist or editor from west of Chicago
-not named Clarence Page- that you frequently see
on the three Sunday morning network TV chat shows?
Or even an Anglo reporter.
No, really, go ahead.
I'll wait.

And for the record, throw into the mix the fact
that both Denver and Dallas have already had
Black mayors while supposedly-sophisticated
Miami and Fort Laudedale have... well, you know,
NEVER have.

Meanwhile, the Usual Media Suspects & Guests
from the East Coast continue to dominate that
Sunday morning public policy niche despite rarely
if ever bringing anything new to the party to discuss.

And yet, that pattern merits not a squeak in
newspapers here or elsewhere from the likes
of Pitts.
Just saying.

I hate to be the one to break it to you all,
but as has been the case for years and years
in American society, in places large and small,
lists are not complied and awards are not given
based entirely on merit.

For instance, consider the case of the NFL's
Pro Bowl selections for the past forty years or
People magazine's annual 50 Most Beautiful
People
issue.
http://www.people.com/people/

Neither is very realistic or objective, as in the '70's
and '80's, the same offensive linemen were honored
year-after-year, even in down years, while players
at other positions were honored in a more honest
fashion, based on their individual sack stats and,
frankly, whether they were seen on national TV a lot,
and could be seen, which always explains why more
Cowboys get honored than seems mathematically
probable.

It's simple -they get more exposure.
And it's no accident, either.

In that era, certain players were mortal locks to be
named even before the season started unless they
got injured during the season and missed large chunks
of playing time, while a few rare others, like Dolphins
center Dwight Stephnson, were mortal locks
precisely because they actually were that superior
to their competitors, as evidenced by the fact that
the Electors at the NFL Hall of Fame voted him in
during his first year of eligibility, 1998.
http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/member.aspx?PlayerId=204

I don't know whether it's true or not but I have
heard a story that when Stephenson first became
Hall eligible, Edwin Pope of the Herald spoke on
his behalf at the annual meeting of select pro football
correspondents and past Hall enshrinees, stood-up
and said simply, "Gentlemen, Dwight Stephenson."
Then he sat down.

There wasn't anything else Pope needed to say because
Stephenson was so self-evidently a dominant player
of his era, and maybe the best ever at that position.

Likewise, People's annual best-seller is built to a large
extent on the opinions of a handful of powerful Talent
Agencies and publicists pushing -"strongly suggesting"-
clients of their who have a new film, album, exhibit
or something consumer-oriented coming-out that
the editors at People know will have some built-in
consumer interest or buzz.

They want to capitalize on that so that everyone in
the interaction is happy: agent, publicist, star and
editorial staff.

And that goes double for all popular Women magazines
that you see no mater what sort of store you go into,
whether Target, Publix or 7/11, like Vogue.
http://www.vogue.com/
It's not journalism that decide who's on the cover,
it's strictly marketing.

Above, longtime South Beach Hoosier favorite Rachel
McAdams on January's Vogue magazine in time to
promote her new Sherlock Holmes film.

At Vanity Fair magazine, http://www.vanityfair.com/
they've long taken a much-more political and provocative
sensibility on these matters, by consciously choosing to
have a great editorial mix, with inspired and talented
journalism from the likes of Bethany McLean,
formerly of FORTUNE magazine, and someone who
really knows how to tell a story involving business,
as I've written here before.

But they still want to sell lots of magazines!

Which is why actresses Abbie Cornish, Kristen Stewart
and Carey Mulligan are on the cover of March's issue,
as seen at top, Mulligan being an Oscar-nominee.
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/features/2010/03/cover-girls-behind-the-scenes-slideshow-201003#slide=1

(See October 9, 2009 Los Angeles Times,
MOVIE REVIEW
'An Education' Carey Mulligan glows with a girl's innocence and
insight and inhabits the role of Jenny in a way viewers will never forget
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/09/entertainment/et-education9 )

Plus, sometimes, the magazine editors throw in that sentimental
wild card to remain on good terms with someone who has
been out of the spotlight, for whatever reason.

Like any group of people responding to questions about
a list, or even a survey, some people take it very seriously
and try to be meticulous in their responses, while others,
if the subject is more mundane, answer whimsically
or even in a way intentionally designed to get away
from what the original intent of the list is, and highlight
someone or something else, to prove a point.
Our old friend -the wild card.

I know that, you know that, but not Leonard Pitts, Jr.

I used to see that a lot when I was younger and read
the Village Voice and saw their annual musical picks
for best this and that, their Pazz and Jop Poll, since it
seemed like every reporter and columnists doubled-down
on wild cards.

If enough self-selected people play the new wild card,
often enough, at some point, everyone else in media
is talking about the wild card because they don't want
to be left out of the conversation.

Who are they?
What have they done?

Who are they represented by? (William Morris, ICA, Gersh?
)
Are they connected to anyone we already know?
Are they the new "X"?

(X being anything from the media's pick for the next
Paul Newman (Matthew McConaghey) to the next
Italian sex-bomb (

The question never asked is "Are they actually talented
or a coming fad?
"
That's entirely beside the point.

At some point, the wild card overshadows the people on
the list that everyone agrees on, i.e. a Charlize Theron
vs. Shania Twain fight never materializes at People
because they're mortal locks.

Fearless prediction: Whenever the fabulous Shania Twain
is ready to come back to the public with a new CD ,
People magazine will be there, ready, willing and able
to give her a cover story where she looks amazing.
(It's just that in her case, she's already amazing looking.)
Because if they aren't, US will be.

The real fights come over the low-hanging fruit, since they
are in the business of getting consumers to purchase copies
of the magazine and reading the ads and patronizing the
advertisers, not deciding whether Leighton Meester
is more deserving of inclusion than Ashley Greene in
being in the Most Beautiful People issue.

At their level, it's whoever has the buggest project coming-up.

Like any media-generated list, it's as weak as the persons
making the list.

And in the case of Pitts, a totally-predictable
Herald columnist who uses phrases like "so-called"
more than all the paper's other columnists combined,
someone who never brings anything new to his
rhetorical soap box battles, that lazy cruise-control
of his has reached the predictable point where his
NOT knowing the facts involved in a particular
situation doesn't preclude him from weighing-in
with his cliched comments, his admission in the case
above that he never even saw the list but comments
anyway, being proof positive of my point.

Happy
"res ipsa loquitur" over at One Herald Plaza!

----------------
Video: Bethany McLean on the Hedge Fund Era
Story at:
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2009/03/video-bethany-mclean-on-the-hedge-fund-era.html